[Salon] To Woo Trump, VP Contenders Show Off Their Rich Friends - The New York Times



Title: To Woo Trump, VP Contenders Show Off Their Rich Friends - The New York Times
Some very illustrious, Military Tech Industry Oligarchs here (but don’t call Thiel, et al., "Big Tech,” call them “Surveillance/Cognitive War Tech,” embedded in all of the U.S./NATO and Israeli militaries. 

I admit, my bet would have been on J.D. Vance for Trump’s VP, as Peter Thiel’s "Main Man,” and as fellow New Right National Conservatives, in some measure because of Peter Thiel’s money. But more importantly, linked up as they are with Israeli Settler Yoram Hazony, described well at the link below, and in their shared hostility toward anything to the left of Mussolini, and against Russia, China, Iran, and Palestinians/Lebanese. And most importantly, their absolute loyalty to Israeli Fascists: 

But, even with Peter Thiel's alleged intention to not put any money into the campaign, I will stick with that prediction, as only Vance has the “NatCon” ideological bonafides necessary to take that Movement into the future most rapidly, as potentially next POTUS after Trump. And therefore, be in place with Trump as Israeli fascist’s representatives in the two highest political offices in the U.S. A genuine “coup,” for Netanyahu, Ben-Gvir, and Smotrich, the Israeli Fascist Triumvirate, and for their “Settler Political Theorist,” Yoram Hazony and his New Right/NatCon co-ideologues. 

Knowing the great support they have here, don’t miss seeing these guys coming up in D.C. soon, where the only VP candidate mentioned below, Vance, will be a featured speaker: 
https://nationalconservatism.org/natcon-4-2024/confirmed-speakers/, and cementing the case that he too will be Israeli Fascists "Best Friend,” as Trump  As he did here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVzoZwoU_RY. It will be like attending an important historical event, like the Nuremberg Rallies of the 1930s. Sadly, there is no alternative in today’s U.S. politics, from either party, varying only by degree, as they do. 


To Woo Trump, VP Contenders Show Off Their Rich Friends

Vice-presidential hopefuls are posturing as part of a bid to highlight their ties to wealthy donors.

Donald Trump walks down steps off the stage at a rally this month in Las Vegas. He is wearing a suit but no tie, and a red MAGA hat.
Former President Donald J. Trump is expected to name his running mate in the coming weeks. His shortlist is said to be Senator J.D. Vance, Gov. Doug Burgum and Senator Marco Rubio.Jenna Schoenefeld for The New York Times

Sign up for the On Politics newsletter.  Your guide to the 2024 elections.

During his 2016 campaign, Donald J. Trump orchestrated a takeover of the Republican Party in part by blasting wealthy political donors as the root of corruption and delivering a populist message that appealed to working-class voters.

Eight years later, one of his key decision points in choosing a running mate is connections to the superrich.

As the end of the selection process approaches, with an announcement expected in the next two weeks after months of suggestion and misdirection, Republican hopefuls are looking to convince Mr. Trump that they have the financial backing behind them that could help swing the race.

There are other factors that could make for a good match. Mr. Trump is said to be considering candidates with discipline on the campaign trail, who will not steal his precious spotlight and would fare well in a debate with Vice President Kamala Harris.

But the money definitely matters — and some Republican donors with direct access to Mr. Trump have left unmistakable fingerprints on his process. Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, for example, became a top contender late in the selection process after persistent lobbying from Steve Wynn, the billionaire former casino mogul who is close to Mr. Trump. Mr. Wynn has also played a role in persuading some other donors, such as Elon Musk, to be more supportive of the campaign.

Many vice-presidential hopefuls, including some outside contenders wise to the financial dynamic, have responded, boasting — and sometimes exaggerating — the amount they could raise for the ticket. The posturing, in some cases, has drawn sneers from some Republican donors, who feel like they are being used as pawns in internecine warfare.

Senator Tom Cotton speaking in front of a bank of microphones talking to reporters.
Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas became a late breaking vice-presidential contender at the urging of billionaire Steve Wynn.Pete Marovich for The New York Times

But the most successful financial jockeying has come from the three contenders who are, as of now, viewed as the top candidates for the job: Senator J.D. Vance of Ohio, Gov. Doug Burgum of North Dakota and Senator Marco Rubio of Florida.

Mr. Burgum, a former software executive who sold a company to Microsoft, has an estimated net worth of at least $100 million, according to Forbes, suggesting he could inject some of his fortune into the race. He spent more than $10 million on his own short-lived, long-shot presidential bid last year.

He has also sought to demonstrate his fund-raising potential for Mr. Trump by luring wealthy first-time donors to the president’s corner. On Tuesday, Mr. Burgum hosted a video conference with donors where the campaign charged $10,000 merely to join the call, and $25,000 to participate in a question-and-answer session, according to a copy of the invitation.

Gov. Doug Burgum walking on a red carpet at a Trump rally in Wildwood, N.J.
Gov. Doug Burgum has a personal fortune that could help a Trump ticket.Doug Mills/The New York Times

Tom Siebel, a billionaire tech investor, wrote his first check to Mr. Trump — for $500,000 — because Mr. Burgum was in the mix for the Republican ticket. Dick Boyce, a longtime Republican fund-raiser in Silicon Valley who is a former chairman for both Burger King and Del Monte Foods, said he had also made his second donation to Mr. Trump — a $100,000 contribution — in part owing to his consideration of Mr. Burgum, who was a classmate at Stanford Business School.

“I’m inclined to do more with Doug in the V.P. position, and the complimentary nature of him and Trump would give confidence to a lot more people, too,” Mr. Boyce, a former partner at Bain & Company, said in an interview. “The vice president is someone who you could picture being president, not someone who might deliver a certain state, and sometimes that gets lost.”

Then there is Mr. Vance. A former venture capitalist, Mr. Vance organized a $12 million fund-raising event this month in Silicon Valley, part of an attempt to show his ability to draw tech industry donations.

Despite those efforts and Mr. Vance’s rise in Trumpworld, Mr. Vance’s single biggest donor remains a glaring holdout: the Silicon Valley megadonor Peter Thiel. Mr. Thiel, who put $15 million into an effort to elect Mr. Vance to the Senate in 2022 and used to employ him, said definitively on Thursday, for the first time, that he would not be a major financial supporter of Mr. Trump, as he had been in 2016. And it didn’t sound as if naming Mr. Vance to the ticket would change that.

“If you hold a gun to my head, I will vote for Trump,” Mr. Thiel said at the Aspen Ideas Festival. “I’m not going to give any money to his super PAC.”

Mr. Rubio, who built a formidable fund-raising operation for his own presidential bid in 2016, could be an attractive option for the Republican donors and groups who helped plow more than $146 million into an effort to nominate former Gov. Nikki Haley of South Carolina, who was Mr. Trump’s last remaining primary opponent this year.

Ms. Haley’s supporters include some prominent Republican holdouts in the billionaire class, such as the hedge fund titans Paul Singer and Kenneth Griffin.

And then there are outside contenders like Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina, who has aggressively sought to position himself as a darling of the donor class, claiming support from people including Mr. Singer and Larry Ellison, the Oracle founder. A week ago in Washington, Mr. Scott hosted a gathering for supporters of his new policy group that, three attendees say, had little subtlety as to its purpose.

The event, in their view, was an overt show of his support among well-heeled Republican donors. Speakers included billionaires like the venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, the billionaire investor Bill Ackman, the oil developer Tim Dunn and Marc Rowan, the chief executive of the investment firm Apollo Global Management.

Some donors tied to the event have bristled at the way the Scott team and the news media have implicitly positioned them as endorsers of a Trump-Scott ticket, according to a person close to these donors. In reality, this person said, many people signed onto Mr. Scott’s event believing that he is likely to be the next powerful chair of the Senate Banking Committee. An aide to Mr. Scott declined to comment.

There was not much talk from Mr. Scott about the vice presidency explicitly, or even Mr. Trump, at the event, according to two attendees. And though he drew big potential donors, many big Scott supporters say privately they are pessimistic about his chances in the veepstakes.

Get the full Times experience.

You’re currently a news-only subscriber. Upgrade to enjoy all of The Times at no extra cost for 6 months.

Upgrade nowBilled at your current rate every 4 weeks for 6 months. Cancel anytime.


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.